As product designers, we’re no strangers to the concept of “building the plane while flying it.” This phrase perfectly captures the reality of designing AI-driven products: rapidly evolving, adapting on the go, and iterating based on real-time insights. The recent case study on implementing feedback loops in Large Language Models (LLMs) by People + AI Research brings this idea to life, diving deep into how feedback can shape the development of AI features.
But as I read this case study, a key question kept emerging: Should the feedback loop be treated as a standalone capability or as an integral part of the workflow for each feature? Let’s explore this idea from a product design perspective.
The Feedback Loop Dilemma: Standalone vs. Integrated
When building AI products, feedback loops play a critical role in refining performance, addressing errors, and ensuring continuous learning. They are the lifeblood of effective AI, providing the necessary input to train and improve models over time. However, there’s a fundamental design decision to make: is the feedback loop a separate capability that supports overall product evolution, or is it something that should be embedded directly into the workflow of each feature?
Feedback Loop as a Standalone Capability
Treating the feedback loop as a separate capability has some advantages, particularly when considering the broader system architecture. Centralized feedback collection allows for more comprehensive data analysis, revealing patterns across features and offering holistic insights into user behavior and model performance. It provides a broader context that helps designers and engineers address systemic issues and make strategic product adjustments.
However, this approach risks creating a disconnection between users’ immediate experiences and the actions needed to improve the product. Users might see the feedback process as an “extra step,” which can reduce their engagement and diminish the effectiveness of feedback. Additionally, it can be harder for users to link the feedback they provide to visible changes in a specific feature, making the entire process feel distant or abstract.
Feedback Loop as Part of the Workflow
Embedding feedback directly into the workflow of each feature feels more natural for the user and aligns with the broader design principle of creating seamless, intuitive experiences. By integrating feedback into the user's flow, you make it easy for them to provide immediate reactions, suggest improvements, and even highlight issues while engaging with the feature. This approach increases the likelihood of capturing authentic, timely feedback and aligns user interactions with the intended use case.
For designers, integrating feedback within the workflow creates opportunities for micro-adjustments and quicker iteration. By gathering input in context, designers gain insights that are more specific and actionable, allowing for targeted refinements that improve user satisfaction and feature performance.
Balancing Both Approaches
In reality, the best design approach might be a blend of both. A feedback system that offers standalone insights can inform strategic, system-wide improvements, while embedded feedback loops within individual workflows ensure that specific features evolve based on immediate user needs. Here’s how designers can strike this balance:
Identify High-Impact Moments for FeedbackNot every interaction needs a feedback prompt. The key is to identify moments when users are most likely to have a reaction—positive or negative—and embed feedback prompts right there. This could be after completing a task, encountering an error, or experiencing an unexpected result. By placing feedback prompts strategically, you can capture valuable data without overwhelming users.
Create a Clear Connection Between Feedback and ChangeUsers are more likely to engage with feedback systems if they see that their input leads to meaningful changes. Communicate how feedback has influenced updates and improvements, whether through release notes, in-app notifications, or other forms of communication. This helps build trust and encourages users to continue providing input.
Leverage Standalone Analytics for Systemic InsightsWhile embedded feedback helps with feature-specific refinement, standalone analytics can provide the bigger picture, identifying trends, pain points, and opportunities across the entire product. Use these insights to guide larger product decisions, such as shifting priorities, reallocating resources, or even launching new features.
The Product Designer’s Role: Iterating in Real-Time
As designers in the AI space, we are not only creating products but also evolving them in real-time. Building AI features truly is like “building the plane while flying it”—you’re constantly balancing innovation with user experience, speed with quality, and AI’s capabilities with real human needs. Integrating feedback loops into the design process is a critical aspect of this balancing act.
When designing for AI, it’s crucial to think of feedback not just as a feature but as a philosophy. It’s not a one-time implementation but an ongoing, iterative process that’s deeply embedded into the culture of the product and the team behind it. By designing products with this mindset, we not only create better experiences but also foster a culture of continuous learning and improvement.
Final Thoughts: The True Value of Feedback in AI Design
In AI-powered design, feedback is more than just a mechanism for improvement—it’s a cornerstone of responsible, user-centered development. Whether you choose to treat feedback as a standalone capability, embed it into each workflow, or (ideally) balance both approaches, remember that its true value lies in its ability to connect user needs with product evolution.
As the plane of AI design continues to fly faster, let’s make sure we’re not just keeping it in the air but guiding it toward a smoother, smarter, and more user-focused journey.
Comments